Law Judgment

Search This Blog

page 1

on November 22, 2024

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Case ID: 001

Title: Land Dispute

Parties: John vs. Smith

Hearing Date: 2024-11-30

Status: Pending

Judge: Judge A

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

MSRTC Legal Office Circular List

MSRTC Legal Office Circular List 1. GSO 503 Download 2. Discipline and Appeal procedure Download 3. सेवा विनिमय Download 4. Discipline and Appeal procedure (New) Download 5. वाहक कर्तव्य Download 6. आगार कार्यपद्दती आणि कर्म, कर्तव्य Download

Contributory Negligence supreme court judgment

Contributory Negligence Will Be Equal When Deceased Car Driver Didn’t Take Sufficient Care While Undertaking & Lorry Was Not Being Driven At Normal Speed: Supreme Court The appeal before the Supreme Court was filed by the claimants against an order determining the contributory negligence of the deceased driver of the car at 70%. Determining the deceased car driver's negligence at 50%, the Supreme Court awarded half the amount of compensation to the claimants and explained that neither the car driver took sufficient care while undertaking the lorry nor the lorry was being driven at a normal speed. The appeal before the Apex Court was filed by the claimants from an order of the High Court, determining the contributory negligence of the deceased driver of the car, whose death was sought to be compensated at 70%. The Division Bench of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice K. Vinod Chandran said, “The fact remains that there was a collision, and that the car was dragged to a distanc...

Workman Is Not Eligible For Payment

Workman Is Not Eligible For Payment Of Gratuity If He Has Questioned Order Of Dismissal From Service: Karnataka HC Click here

Powered by Blogger

page 1

Case ID: 001

Comments

Post a Comment